Hedreich Nichols

September 2026

Educators attend a professional learning session as the screen displays Hedreich Nichols and her Reimagining Questions AI presentation.

I Can’t Spell Anymore: What Spellcheck Teaches Us About AI Literacy in Education

I can’t spell anymore.

That’s a Big Thing. I was a spelling bee winner as a child. I was the kid reading a dictionary after bedtime with a flashlight, internalizing word parts and etymology. And now? I can’t spell “anomaly” without that pesky red line appearing. I know because it just happened, and it’s why I’m writing this blog.

It’s not that spelling is so hugely important in and of itself. But when spellcheck became a thing—and yes, that happened within my lifetime—teachers warned that we would lose our ability to spell.

And here I am, proof in the pudding.

The lesson of spellcheck is not that technology destroys skills. It is that using technology without guidance, boundaries, or intentional practice can weaken the very capabilities it should help us strengthen.

Spellcheck Was Never the Real Problem

Now, if you think this is an AI warning, it is—but not in the way you think.

Using spellcheck did wreck my ability to spell. Now I shoot in the dark, hit “accept,” and never look back. But what if someone had taught me to turn it off for certain tasks? What if I had been taught to keep track of the words I misspelled? What if I had been given some guidance—any guidance—on how to use the tool to further build my capabilities?

The issue was not spellcheck. The issue was unchecked spellcheck. The bigger issue was that we spent a lot of time fighting over something that was already here, something that fundamentally changed the centrality of spelling to education and writing.

I don’t walk to work; I drive. Because of that, I probably can’t walk 15 miles each morning and another 15 each afternoon without consequence. I also can no longer write a whole article without at least one or two red lines popping up. But what is the actual consequence? Proofing tools now augment my ability to write efficiently and without errors while my brain cells are used for more complex tasks. By the way, the squiggly red line just taught me that “brain cells” is two words, not one. Integrated writing assistants will now do the same for this generation of students. Not might. Will.

What Cell Phones Should Have Taught Schools

While we argue in schools about AI or no AI, students are becoming comfortable with these tools. They are also outpacing many of their educators and other caring adults in both the use and abuse of them.

According to Pew Research Center’s 2026 report on teen AI use, 64% of U.S. teens use AI chatbots, and 54% have used them for help with schoolwork. Students are not waiting for us to finish debating.

Case in point: We spent our formative years as a society debating the safety and propriety of cell-phone use instead of learning how to use cell phones and their associated technologies wisely.

Now we’re banning cell phones in schools, largely because we never developed restraint, established boundaries, or taught practical strategies for responsible use.

We focused on debating the arrival of the technology without planning for a future shaped by it.

AI Is Already Part of Education

AI is here. It is already integrated into systems we barely think about, just as the internet quietly became integrated into our phones. While we debate what constitutes appropriate use, we also need to envision—and prepare for—a future in which AI is simply a fact of life. That means paying attention now. Learning now. Teaching now.

Authentic Learning Builds Critical Thinking

If you want students to develop critical-thinking skills, give them authentic tasks that require those skills in real time. Paper assignments have always been a poor substitute for authentic learning.

Teach—and test—patterns, math, and even coding with fruit, buttons, coins, and other real objects instead of relying only on worksheets. Build early writing and ELA skills through oral storytelling, transcripts, and book authoring. Teach science through simple lab work and cooking. Teach social sciences through community and family projects.

And while you ensure that students learn the basic skills you are so certain they will need—because they might not need all of them in the ways we once did—work on your own skills, too.

Take advantage of any number of free AI courses, including the Google AI Educator Series. First, sign in for the Google AI Educator Series and choose Hedreich Nichols when asked how you heard about it. Then begin the free Google AI Educator Series learning.

Tell ’em I sent you. Literally.

Get literate, then practice. Because if you really want to prepare students for their future, you need to be prepared to guide them on their way.

Additional Free AI Courses for Educators

Here are a few more free courses that can help you catch up to your students, get ahead, and ensure that they can move forward safely and successfully in the era of AI.

  • AI for Productivity (Coursera)
    The focus: Streamlining your daily administrative workload.
    Why take it: This practical course explores ways to use tools like ChatGPT and Gemini to automate administrative tasks, summarize long documents, and draft emails or newsletters in seconds.

  • AI 101 for Educators (Code.org, Khan Academy, and ISTE)
    The focus: Preparing teachers to guide students through the AI landscape.
    Why take it: It provides classroom frameworks, lesson plans, and discussion ideas to help K–12 students understand topics such as algorithmic bias, digital ethics, and responsible AI use.

  • Microsoft AI for Educators Learning Path
    The focus: Expanding classroom technology use and customized student support.
    Why take it: This learning path moves beyond chatbots to explore Microsoft 365 Copilot, specialized Learning Accelerators that support student growth, and gamified approaches to ethics through Minecraft Education.

  • Google Machine Learning Crash Course
    The focus: Demystifying how AI algorithms “think.”
    Why take it: It is fast-paced, highly visual, and filled with interactive exercises. It is a strong choice for educators who want a deeper conceptual understanding of the “magic” behind AI without immediately diving into advanced code.

  • Harvard CS50’s Introduction to Artificial Intelligence with Python
    The focus: Building artificial intelligence from scratch.
    Why take it: This rigorous, university-level curriculum is suited to tech-savvy educators and computer science teachers. It explores the mathematical models, probability, and Python code that drive modern machine learning. I might even use it as curriculum or extension work in a computer science classroom!

Educators, Let’s Learn AI to Guide Students

The days when proofing tools were seen as special technologies are long gone. Most of us now move through the day with a phone, calculator, computer, AI assistant, banking tool, and more in our pockets—often without giving any of them much thought. And yes, those pocket tools can cause mayhem in the classroom. With cell phones, we waited until the stallion had been roaming free for decades before trying to manage it. Let’s not make the same mistake with AI.

Educators, get on board. Get prepared. Then guide students safely into a future that AI will absolutely be a part of, until the next unimaginable thing comes along.


I Can’t Spell Anymore: What Spellcheck Teaches Us About AI Literacy in Education Read More »

Young Hedreich Nichols with afro puffs watching Dolly Parton perform on television in a 1970s family living room.

Would We Have Loved Dolly Parton Before She Was Dolly?

“OMG, who is that?”

“Lookin’ like she came in straight from the streets!”

“Shameful, looking like that in the Lord’s house.”

“Bless her heaaarrrrt”

And if it was in any of the churches I could worship in as a little Black girl… 

“Hmpf. She must be up in here trying to get one of our men. Her weight in the wrong place tho. All coming, nothing going.”

“She is kinda cute when she smiles though. Dimples. She just needs to take off some of that makeup and cut down them fake ass nails. OOPS, made me cuss in church.”

What if she was a registered sub on our campus?

“No she didn’t show up like that at a school!”

“She think this is Vegas? Or worse??”

“Ma’am, our administrator needs to have a word.”

And yet. Flags at half-mast. Tributes and interviews from every industry. Her songs and quotes trending sounds on social media platforms, used by gays and Christians alike.

But what if Dolly, unknown as the star we all came to love, had walked into our church, our school, or our neighborhood? Let’s not pretend she would have been the girl we all wanted to have coffee with, the one we thought would be perfect to head up the Ladies’ Tea committee.

We would have looked at her ostentatious makeup and long nails and assumed things.

She’s a loose woman. A trollop. Fast. Hot. Thirsty. She has zero style, she’s cheap, uncultured, and probably dumb as rocks if she has to pimp herself out like that. Did I cover all generations? 

And what the aitch ee double ell is up with those oversized fake boobs??

Bleached Blonde Hair and Blind Spots

Let’s not pretend that we would have seen her as the multiple-income-stream poster child worth $450–$460 million, with her fingers picking not only guitars and banjos, but winners in industries across entertainment, farming, fashion, real estate, and more. Even with that sweet voice, we could not have predicted she’d be someone who would write over 3,000 songs worth $6–$8 million in royalties every year. We would never have guessed that she would have the moxie to refuse to give up publishing rights to Elvis, and that that one decision would go on to earn her $10–$20 million alone from Whitney’s cover of I Will Always Love You.

The local gossips, while trashing her clothes and makeup, would never have thought that the bleached blonde in a cheap wig (Dolly’s words, actually) would give away millions and millions of dollars, just because that is who she was.

And “millions and millions” isn’t hyperbole. We all know about her giving away books (roughly 3.5 million monthly, btw). But Dolly ain’t new to this, she’s true to this. 

Back in 1988, when one in three kids in her home county were dropping out of school, she told the eighth graders to buddy up. If you and your buddy both made it all the way through high school, Dolly herself would hand each of you a $500 check. The dropout rate reportedly went down to 6%.

Then there are the people working at Dollywood. Full-time, part-time, seasonal, it didn’t matter. In 2022, the company told employees who wanted to continue their education that they would get 100% of their tuition, fees, and books covered. Imagine being the person somebody dismissed as the tacky blonde with the boobs and the nails, turning around and making sure the teenager selling funnel cakes at your theme park could go to college for free.

Teachers get some Dolly love too. Her Chasing Rainbows Award annually celebrates a teacher who has pushed through personal obstacles while still managing to change children’s lives. And they don’t just get a plaque in the mail. The honoree gets an all-expenses-paid trip to Dollywood to celebrate and be celebrated.

All that from the woman we might have taken one look at and decided lacked class. Turns out, maybe we were looking for class in the wrong places.

What Dolly Can Teach Us About Perception

And there’s an educator question buried in all of this too. When we look around our classrooms, campuses, and staff meetings, how often are we responding to what we actually see, and how often are we responding to the story we’ve attached to it? How quickly do we mistake our interpretation of a person for information about that person? Clothes become “doesn’t care.” Quiet becomes “doesn’t know.” Loud becomes “disrespectful.” Poor becomes “unmotivated.” Nails, lashes, dialect, politics, gender presentation, whatever; we see something, attach a story to it, and then respond to the story as though it’s evidence.

Everybody doesn’t have Dolly’s confidence. Let’s face it, most of us don’t. And it’s hard to feel safe with people when you can feel their judgment before you ever hear it. So for those who remember the old WWJD T-shirts from the ’90s, I keep coming back to WWDD. What would Dolly do? Not because Dolly was Jesus, but:

Would Dolly need someone to believe like her, vote like her, worship like her, love like her, or look like her before deciding they were worth making room for?

From everything I’ve read about her, apparently not, and maybe that’s why I’ve been thinking about Dolly so much. Not because she died beloved by all. But because she lived loving all people.

 

Would We Have Loved Dolly Parton Before She Was Dolly? Read More »